Despite a Federal Court judge eviscerating claims by Dominique Grubisa, a law firm half-owned by a company controlled by her husband seems still to be flogging the nonsense, as IA reports.
IT WAS ON 12 April 2019 that the Law Society of New South Wales (Society) was made aware of false claims made by Dominique Grubisa regarding her asset protection product. Not only was it alerted to her false claims but also that it was sold through a company that was not a law firm.
In early 2020, the Society decided to close its investigation into unqualified practice by Grubisa’s Master Wealth Control Pty Ltd (MWC), despite having been presented with invoices, the documents comprising the product and videos of her presentations.
Yet now in 2024, as part of two cases brought by the Council of the Law Society, the Society says that Grubisa ‘represented that MWC was entitled to engage in legal practice when it was [not entitled to do so because it was] an unqualified entity’.
How did …